Dear Friends,
My next court date is coming in two days.
The zoom link is here for Ontario Superior Court, Courtroom 7-1 at 9:00 am EDT (Toronto time). https://ca01web.zoom.us/j/65919371490
I think some administrative matters will be discussed and Mr. Rosen will let the Ontario Superior Court now that we have formally filed leave for appeal to the Supreme Court of Canada.
The links for our leave to appeal are below. For the legal buffs and those deeply interested in my case I have provided the background decions and papers that inform this case.
To briefly summarize for those who don’t have time or inclination to read that much. The Ontario Court of Appeal Judges, Copeland, Harvison-Young and Sossin (he/him), (Justice Lorne Sossin is woke and assumes you don’t know his gender so he likes to help you out by putting his pronouns after his name) overturned Justice Robert Goldstein’s decision acquitting me of “Wilful Promotion of Hatred.”
The Ontario Court of Appeal’s main argument it seems is Justice Goldstein committed an error egregious enough to warrant a new trial, as he excluded the Prosecution’s “expert” report on the social impact my flyer might have on the LGBTTSIQ, or something to that effect, you can see all the alphabets yourself in Mule’s “expert” report below. The rejection of this report by Justice Goldstein is deemed important enough by Justice Sossin (he/him) to warrant a new trial.
Some exerpts from the links below. These are rendom selections just to give you an idea what is being argued:
Page 10: “the Crown is going to argue at trial proper that the accused flyer invokes long held beliefs about gays as diseased, and ask him (Nick Mule) how these stereotypes exposed the gay community to vilification.”
“[I] asked [the Proposed Expert] about the stereotype of gays being pedophiles and the
conflation between pedophilia and being gay and whether that was present in the flyer, and he gave a very balanced response where he essentially said, I don’t think so.
Justice Sossin (he/him) in writing the decision for the three judge panel thinks my flyer might be playing the “gays are pedophiles trope,” but Mule’ himself didn’t see that trope in my flyer and the Crown never advanced this argument. To be clear I think the Liberal Party of Canada is radically pro-homosexual and is more tolerant of pedophilia than other political parties and I articulated three Liberals and their behaviours that were reported in credible media outlets years ago to make that point.
The Crown’s argument my flyer plays the “gays are diseased and dangerous” trope that already failed:
Mr. Whatcott’s message is clear that gays are dangerous because they carry this deadly virus that dehumanizes them, and they become unworthy of the very basic human characteristic of love.
Mr. Whatcott’s message is similarly clear, gays are dangerous because they have this deadly virus and [are] unworthy of nothing but the deepest feelings of disgust and loathing.
So to sum up why this is hate, he, Mr. Whatcott employed the constellation of devices. He
dehumanized gays as being carriers of disease, he used true lies in the veneer of truth to distort medical fact and create outright lies and he preyed upon the tragic history of gays in Canada.
“What this comes down to is whether Mr. Whatcott’s statements about gays being diseased, and the carriers of disease, is hatred, and it’s the Crown’s submission that this is not a simple warning as envisioned by Christian tradition. The flyer dehumanizes gays as nothing more than the carrier of disease.”
Remember Justice Goldstein did allow expert testimony to be heard from Dr. Mona Loutfy an infectious disease expert and medical doctor who has actually marched in the Toronto homosexual shame parade herself. Unfortunately for the Prosecution their expert was found to be less than honest and in fact chose to try and help the Crown get a conviction by distorting some of her evidence on my flyer, rather than just giving unbiased evidence and letting the facts lead where they may in helping the court to arrive at a just conclusion.
Third, the Court of Appeal found that the Proposed Expert (Mule’) had necessary evidence about the “emotional distress” that the Flyer could have caused to the gay male community whose perspective may have strengthened or diminished its hatefulness. This was not the theory of the Trial Crown. Furthermore, harm is not an element of the criminal promotion of hate speech. Accordingly, its proof cannot be so necessary and material that it warrants overturning an acquittal.
The above is written by my lawyer, Mr. John Rosen. Justice Lorne Sossin (he/him) in writing for the Ontario Court of Appeal thinks the next trial judge needs to look at Mules’ nonsense about my flyer causing “minority stress” which allegedly leads to bad health outcomes, and that somehow this argument will be a credible element in determining whether or not I committed the indictable offense of “Wilful Promotion of Hatred.”
Bill Whatcott’s application for leave to appeal (21 pages, half hour read): https://www.dropbox.com/scl/fi/i3chtlgyl2kju2hbm1q3x/leaveforappeal21pages.pdf?rlkey=t084cumt3tx0a0s7fwhjz984e&dl=0
Bill Whatcott’s Indictment, Justice Goldstien’s written decision to reject homosexual activist Nick Mule’s “expert” evidence, Justice Goldstein’s decision to acquit Bill Whatcott, Ontario Court of Appeal’s decision to order Bill Whatcott to undergo a new trial (114 pages, 2-3 hr read): https://www.dropbox.com/scl/fi/nblfs8swzprjtc25wc5ip/Leaveforappeal114pages.pdf?rlkey=8ggffnxbg2f6ghao06kopuhnq&dl=0
Nick Mule’s “expert” report can be seen on page 39 of this link (20 minute read) and my flyer is on page 54 of this link (3 minute read): https://www.dropbox.com/preview/Camera%20Uploads/Mulepg39Whacottpg54.pdf
Zoom Link for Ontario Superior Courtroom 7-1 for 9:00 am Monday morning EDT: https://ca01web.zoom.us/j/65919371490
Well folks, I try not to bother people for funds too often, but you can see Mr. Rosen’s work in the links above. A generous friend of mine funded the leave to appeal and that is done. Now, whether the Supeme Court agrees to here my case or not more money will be needed to see this fight to the end. If the Supreme Court agrees to hear our case we need money for Mr. Rosen to defend the acquittal and the concept that defendents such as my self should not have to go on trial again once we are already acquitted, something that only seems to happen when homosexual activists are unhappy with the court’s original decision.
If the Supreme Court refuses to entertain our appeal, we will need more money for launching a new defense and going through a new trial. I will need to reside in Toronto again and at this point it is unclear if Mr. Rosen will remain as counsel. In any event God is in control. https://www.lifefunder.com/billwhatcott
“Knowing that He who raised the Lord Jesus will raise us also with Jesus and bring us with you into his presence. For it is all for your sake, so that as grace extends to more and more people it may increase thanksgiving, to the glory of God. So we do not lose heart. Though our outer self is wasting away, our inner self is being renewed day by day. For this light momentary affliction is preparing for us an eternal weight of glory beyond all comparison, as we look not to the things that are seen but to the things that are unseen. For the things that are seen are transient, but the things that are unseen are eternal.“ 2 Corinthians 4:14-18
Bill Whatcott 
Awesome update Bill. Prayers.
Get Outlook for iOShttps://aka.ms/o0ukef ________________________________
LikeLiked by 1 person
Thank you and bless you!
LikeLike